DANIEL
ARTHUR LAPRES
Cabinet
d'avocats
81 rue de la Faisanderie, 75116 Paris
tel:
(331) 01.45.04.62.52 - fax: (331) 45.44.64.45
nous
répondrons à vos messages
__________________________________________________________
ENFORCEMENT
OF JUDGMENTS IN
CIVIL
AND COMMERCIAL MATTERS
PREAMBLE
THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES TO THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN
TITLE
I
1.
the status or legal capacity of natural persons, rights in property arising
out of a matrimonial relationship, wills and succession; 2.
bankruptcy, proceedings relating to the windingup of insolvent companies
or other legal persons, judicialarrangements, compositions and analogous
proceedings; 3.
social security; 4.
arbitration. TITLE
II Jurisdiction Section
1. General provisions Article
2 Subject
to the provisions of this Convention, persons domiciled in a Contracting
State shall, whatever their nationality,
be sued in the courts of that State. Persons who are not nationals of the
State in which they are domiciled shall be governed by the rules of jurisdiction
applicable to nationals of that State. Article
3 Persons
domiciled in a Contracting State may be sued in the courts of another Contracting
State only by virtue of the rules set out in Sections 2 to 6 of this . In
particular the following provisions shall not be applicable as against
them: -
in Belgium: Article 15 of the civil code (Code civil Burgerlijk Wetboek)
and Article 638 of the judicial code (Code
judiciaire Gerechtelijk Wetboek), -
in Denmark: Article 248 (2) of the law on civil procedure (Lov om rettens
pleje) and Chapter
3. Article 3 of the Greenland
law on civil procedure (Lov for Gr‡nland om rettens
pleje), -
in the Federal Republic of Germany: Article 23 of the code of civil procedure
(ZivilprozeÃôordnung), -
in France: Articles 14 and 15 of the civil code (Code civil), -
in Ireland: the rules which enable jurisdiction to be founded on the document
instituting the proceedings having been served on the defendant during
his temporary presence in Ireland, -
in Italy: Articles 2 and 4, Nos 1 and 2 of the code of civil procedure
(Codice di procedura civile), -
in Luxembourg: Articles 14 and 15 of the civil code (Code civil), -
in the Netherlands: Articles 126 (3) and 127 of the code of civil procedure
(Wetboek van Burgerlijke Rechtsvordering), -
in the United Kingdom: the rules which enable jurisdiction to be founded
on: (a)
the document instituting the proceedings having been served on the defendant
during his temporary presence in the United Kingdom; or (b)
the presence within the United Kingdom of property belonging to the defendant;
or (c)
the seizure by the plaintiff of property situated in the United Kingdom. Article
4 If
the defendant is not domiciled in a Contracting State, the jurisdiction
of the courts of each Contracting State shall, subject to the provisions
of Article 16, be determined by the law of that State. As
against such a defendant, any person domiciled in a Contracting State may,
whatever his nationality, avail himself in that State of the rules of jurisdiction
there in force, and in particular those specified in the second paragraph
of Article 3, in the same way as the nationals of that State. Section
2. Special jurisdiction Article
5 A
person domiciled in a Contracting State may, in another Contracting State,
be sued: 1.
in matters relating to a contract, in the courts for the place of performance
of the obligation in question; 2.
in matters relating to maintenance, in the courts for the place where the
maintenance creditor is domiciled or habitually resident or, if the matter
is ancillary to proceedings concerning the status of
a person, in the court which, according to its own law, has jurisdiction
to entertain those proceedings, unless that jurisdiction is based solely
on the nationality of one of the parties; 3.
in matters relating to tort, delict or quasidelict, in the courts for the
place where the harmful event occurred; 4.
as regards a civil claim for damages or restitution which is based on an
act giving rise to criminal proceedings, in the court seised of those proceedings,
to the extent that that court has jurisdiction under its own law to entertain
civil proceedings; 5.
as regards a dispute arising out of the operations of a branch, agency
or other establishment, in the courts for the place in which the branch,
agency or other establishment is situated; 6.
as settlor, trustee or beneficiary of a trust created by the operation
of a statute, or by a written instrument, or created orally and evidenced
in writing, in the courts of the Contracting State in which the trust is
domiciled; 7.
as regards a dispute concerning the payment of remuneration claimed in
respect of the salvage of a cargo or freight, in the court under the authority
of which the cargo or freight in question: (a)
has been arrested to secure such payment, or (b)
could have been so arrested, but bail or other security has been given;
provided that this provision shall apply only if it is claimed that the
defendant has an interest in the cargo or freight or had such an interest
at the time of salvage; Article
6 A
person domiciled in a Contracting State may also be sued: 1.
where he is one of a number of defendants, in the courts for the place
where any one of them is domiciled; 2.
as a third party in an action on a warranty or guarantee or in any other
third party proceedings, in the court seised of the original proceedings,
unless these were instituted solely with the object of removing him from
the jurisdiction of the court which would be competent in his case; 3.
on a counterclaim arising from the same contract or facts on which the
original claim was based, in the court in which the original claim is pending. Article
6a Where
by virtue of this Convention a court of a Contracting State has jurisdiction
in actions relating to liability arising from the use or operation of a
ship, that court, or any other court substituted for this purpose by the
internal law of that State, shall also have jurisdiction over claims for
limitation of such liability. Section
3. Jurisdiction in matters relating to insurance Article
7 In
matters relating to insurance, jurisdiction shall be determined by this
Section, without prejudice to the provisions of Articles 4 and 5 (5). Article
8 An
insurer domiciled in a Contracting State may be sued: 1.
in the courts of the State where he is domiciled, or 2.
in another Contracting State, in the courts for the place where the policyholder
is domiciled, or 3.
if he is a coinsurer, in the courts of a Contracting State in which proceedings
are brought against the leading insurer. An
insurer who is not domiciled in a Contracting State. but has a branch,
agency or other establishment in one of the Contracting States shall, in
disputes arising out of the operations of the branch, agency or establishment,
be deemed to be domiciled in that State. Article
9 In
respect of liability insurance of immovable property, the insurer may in
addition be sued in the courts for the place where the harmful event occurred.
The same applies if movable and immovable property are covered by the same
insurance policy and both are adversely affected by the same contingency. Article
10 In
respect of liability insurance, the insurer may also, if the law of the
court permits it, be joined in proceedings which the injured party has
brought against the insured. The provisions of Articles 7, 8
and 9 shall apply to actions brought by the injured party directly against
the insurer, where such direct actions are permitted. If the law governing
such direct actions provides that the policyholder or the insured may be
joined as a party to the action, the
same court shall have jurisdiction over them. Article
11 Without
prejudice to the provisions of the third paragraph of Article 10, an insurer
may bring proceedings only in the courts of the Contracting State in which
the defendant is domiciled, irrespective of whether he is the policyholder,
the insured or a beneficiary. The provisions of this Section shall not
affect the right to bring a counterclaim in the court in which, in accordance
with this Section, the original claim is pending. Article
12 The
provisions of this Section may be departed from only by an agreement on
jurisdiction: 1.
which is entered into after the dispute has arisen, or 2.
which allows the policyholder, the insured or a beneficiary to bring proceedings
in courts other than those indicated in this Section, or 3.
which is concluded between a policyholder and an insurer, both of whom
are at the time of conclusion of the contract domiciled or habitually resident
in the same Contracting State, and which has the effect of conferring jurisdiction
on the courts of that State even if the harmful event were to occur abroad,
provided that such an agreement is not contrary to the law of that State,
or 4.
which is concluded with a policyholder who is not domiciled in a Contracting
State, except in so far as the insurance is compulsory or relates to immovable
property in a Contracting State, or 5.
which relates to a contract of insurance in so far as it covers one or
more of the risks set out in Article 12a. Article
12a The
following are the risks referred to in Article 12 (5): 1.
Any loss of or damage to (a)
seagoing ships, installations situated offshore or on the high seas, or
aircraft, arising from perils which
relate to their use for commercial purposes, (b)
goods in transit other than passengers' baggage where the transit consists
of or includes carriage by such
ships or aircraft; 2.
Any liability, other than for bodily injury to passengers or loss of or
damage to their baggage, (a)
arising out of the use or operation of ships, installations or aircraft
as referred to
in (1) (a) above in so far as the law of the Contracting State in which
such aircraft are registered does not prohibit agreements on
jurisdiction regarding insurance of such risks, (b)
for loss or damage caused by goods in transit as described in (1) (b) above; 3.
Any financial loss connected with the use or operation of ships, installations
or aircraft as referred to in (1) (a) above, in particular loss of freight
or charterhire; 4.
Any risk or interest connected with any of those referred to in (1) to
(3) above. Section
4. Jurisdiction over consumer contract Article
13 In
proceedings concerning a contract concluded by a person for a purpose which
can be regarded as being outside his trade or profession, hereinafter called
"the consumer", jurisdiction shall be determined by this Section, without
prejudice to the provisions of Articles 4 and 5 (5), if it is: 1.
a contract for the sale of goods on instalment credit terms, or 2.
a contract for a loan repayable by instalments, or for any other form of
credit, made to finance the sale of goods, or 3.
any other contract for the supply of goods or a contract for the supply
of services, and (a)
in the State of the consumer's domicile the conclusion of the contract
was preceded by
a specific invitation
addressed to him or by advertising, and (b)
the consumer took in that State the steps necessary for the conclusion
of the contract. Where
the consumer enters into a contract with a party who is not domiciled in
a Contracting State but has a branch,
agency or other establishment in one of the Contracting States, that party
shall, in disputes arising out of the operations of the branch, agency
or establishment, be deemed to be domiciled in that State. This
Section shall not apply to contracts of transport. Article
14 A
consumer may bring proceedings against the other party to a contract either
in the courts of the Contracting State in which that party is domiciled
or in the courts of the Contracting State inwhich he is himself domiciled. Proceedings
may be brought against a consumer by the other party to the contract only
in the courts of the Contracting State in which the consumer is domiciled. These
provisions shall not affect the right to bring a counterclaim in the court
in which, in accordance with this Section, the original claim is pending. Article
15 The
provisions of this Section may be departed from only by an agreement: 1.
which is entered into after the dispute has arisen, or 2.
which allows the consumer to bring proceedings in courts other than those
indicated in this Section, or 3.
which is entered into by the consumer and the other party to the contract,
both of whom are at the time of conclusion of the contract domiciled or
habitually resident in the same Contracting State, and which confers jurisdiction
on the courts of that State, provided that such an agreement is not contrary
to the law of that State. Section
5. Exclusive jurisdiction Article
16 The
following courts shall have exclusive jurisdiction, regardless of domicile: 1.
in proceedings which have as their object rights in rem in, or tenancies
of, immovable property, the courts of the Contracting State in which the
property is situated; 2.
in proceedings which have as their object the validity of the constitution,
the nullity or the dissolution of companies or other legal persons or associations
of natural or legal persons, or the decisions of their organs, the courts
of the Contracting State in which the company, legal person or association
has its seat; 3.
in proceedings which have as their object the validity of entries in public
registers, the courts of the Contracting State in which the register is
kept; 4.
in proceedings concerned with the registration or validity of patents,
trade marks, designs, or other similar rights required to be deposited
or registered, the courts of the Contracting State in which the deposit
or registration has been applied for, has taken place or is under the terms
of an international convention deemed to have taken place; 5.
in proceedings concerned with the enforcement of judgments, the courts
of the Contracting States in which the judgment has been or is to be enforced. Section
6. Prorogation of jurisdiction Article
17 If
the parties, one or more of whom is domiciled in a Contracting State, have
agreed
that a court or the courts of a Contracting State are to have jurisdiction
to settle any disputes which have arisen or which
may arise in connection with a particular legal relationship, that court
or those courts shall have exclusive jurisdiction. Such an agreement conferring
jurisdiction shall be either in writing or evidenced in writing or, in
international trade or commerce, in a form which accords with practice
in that trade or commerce of which the parties are or ought to have been
aware. Where such an agreement is concluded by parties, none of whom is
domiciled in a Contracting State, the courts of other Contracting States
shall have no jurisdiction over their disputes unless the court or courts
chosen have declined jurisdiction. The court or courts of a Contracting
State on which a trust instrument has conferred jurisdiction shall have
exclusive jurisdiction in any proceedings brought against a settlor, trustee
or beneficiary, if relations between these persons or their rights or obligations
under the trust are involved. Agreements
or provisions of a trust instrument conferring jurisdiction shall have
no legal force if they are contrary to the provisions of Article 12 or
15, or if the courts whose jurisdiction they purport to exclude have exclusive
jurisdiction by virtue of Article 16. If
an agreement conferring jurisdiction was concluded for the benefit of only
one of the parties, that party shall retain the right to bring proceedings
in any other court which has jurisdiction by virtue of this Convention. Article
18 Apart
from jurisdiction derived from other provisions of this Convention, a court
of a Contracting State before whom a defendant enters an appearance shall
have jurisdiction. This rule shall not apply where appearance was entered
solely to contest the jurisdiction, or where another court has exclusive
jurisdiction by virtue of Article 16. Section
7. Examination as to jurisdiction and admissibility Where
a court of a Contracting State is seised of a claim which is principally
concerned with a matter over which the courts of another Contracting State
have exclusive jurisdiction by virtue of Article 16, it shall declare of
its own motion that it has no jurisdiction. Article
20 Where
a defendant domiciled in one Contracting State is sued in a court of another
Contracting State and does not enter an appearance, the court shall declare
of its own motion that it has no jurisdiction unless its jurisdiction is
derived from the provisions of this Convention. The
court shall stay the proceedings so long as it is not shown that the defendant
has been able to receive the document instituting the proceedings or an
equivalent document in sufficient time to enable him to arrange for his
defence, or that all necessary steps have been taken to this end. The
provisions of the foregoing paragraph shall be replaced by those of Article
15 of the Hague Convention of 15 November 1965 on the service abroad of
judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters, if
the document instituting the proceedings or notice thereof had to be transmitted
abroad in accordance with that Convention. Section
8. Lis Pendens related actions Article
21 Where
proceedings involving the same cause of action and between the same parties
are brought in the courts of different Contracting States, any court other
than the court first seised shall of its own motion decline jurisdiction
in favour of that court. A
court which would be required to decline jurisdiction may stay its proceedings
if the jurisdiction of the other court is contested. Article
22 Where
related actions are brought in the courts of different Contracting States,
any court other than the court first seised may, while the actions are
pending at first instance, stay its proceedings. A
court other than the court first seised may also, on the application of
one of the parties, decline jurisdiction if the law of that court permits
the consolidation of related actions and the court first seised has jurisdiction
over both actions. For
the purposes of this Article, actions are deemed to be related where they
are so closely connected that it is expedient to hear and determine them
together to avoid the risk of irreconcilable judgments resulting from separate
proceedings. Article
23 Where
actions come within the exclusive jurisdiction of several courts, any court
other than the court first seised shall decline jurisdiction in favour
of that court. Section
9. Provisional, including protective, measures Article
24 Application
may be made to the courts of a Contracting State for such provisional,
including protective, measures as may be available under the law of that
State, even if, under this Convention, the courts of another Contracting
State have jurisdiction as to the substance of the matter. TITLE
III Recognition
and enforcement For
the purposes of this Convention, "judgment" means any judgment given by
a court or tribunal of a Contracting State, whatever the judgment may be
called, including a decree, order, decision or writ of execution, as well
as the determination of costs or expenses by an officer of the court. Section
1. Recognition Article
26 If
the outcome of proceedings in a court of a Contracting State depends on
he determination of an incidental question of recognition that court shall
have jurisdiction over that question. Article
27 A
judgment shall not be recognized: 1.
if such recognition is contrary to public policy in the State in which
recognition is sought; 2.
where it was given in default of appearance, if the defendant was not duly
served with the document which instituted the proceedings or with an equivalent
document in sufficient time to enable him to arrange for his defence; 3.
if the judgment is irreconcilable with a judgment given in a dispute between
the same parties in the State in which recognition is sought; 4.
if the court of the State in which the judgment was given, in order to
arrive at its judgment, has decided a preliminary question concerning the
status or legal capacity of natural persons, rights in property arising
out of a matrimonial relationship, wills or succession in a way that conflicts
with a rule of the private international law of the State in which the
recognition is sought, unless the same result would have been reached by
the application of the rules of private international law of that State; 5.
if the judgment is irreconcilable with an earlier judgment given in a nonContracting
State involving the same cause of action and between the same parties,
provided that this latter jugdment fulfils the conditions necessary for
its recognition in the State addresses. Article
28 Moreover,
a judgment shall not be recognized if it conflicts with the provisions
of Section 3, 4 or 5 of II, or in a case provided for in Article
59. In
its examination of the grounds of jurisdiction referred to in the foregoing
paragraph, the court or authority applied to shall be bound by the findings
of fact on which the court of the State in which the judgment was given
based its jurisdiction. Subject
to the provisions of the first paragraph, the jurisdiction of the court
of the State in which the judgment was given may not be reviewed; the test
of public policy referred to in Article 27 (1) may not be applied to the
rules relating to jurisdiction. Article
29 Under
no circumstances may a foreign judgment be reviewed as to its substance. Article
30 A
court of a Contracting State in which recognition is sought of a judgment
given in another Contracting State may stay the proceedings if an ordinary
appeal against the judgment has been lodged. A
court of a Contracting State in which recognition is sought of a judgment
given in Ireland or the United Kingdom
may stay the proceedings if enforcement is suspended in the State in which
the judgment was given by reason of an appeal. Section
2. Enforcement
A
judgment given in a Contracting State and enforceable in that State shall
be enforced in another Contracting State when, on the application of any
interested party, the order for its enforcement has been issued there. However,
in the United Kingdom, such a judgment shall be enforced in England and
Wales, in Scotland, or in Northern Ireland when, on the application of
any interested party, it has been registered for enforcement in that part
of the United Kingdom. Article
32 The
application shall be submitted: -
in Belgium, to the tribunal de premiere instance or rechtbank van eerste
aan leg. -
in Denmark, to the underret, -
in the Federal Republic of Germany, to the presiding judge of a chamber
of the Landgericht, -
in France, to the presiding judge of the tribunal de grande instance, in
Ireland, to the
High Court, -
in Italy, to the corte d'appello, -
in Luxembourg, to the presiding judge of the tribunal d'arrondissement, -
in the Netherlands, to the presiding judge of the arrondissementsrechtbank,
- in the United Kingdom: 1.
in England and Wales, to the High Court of Justice or in the case of a
maintenance judgment to the Magistrates' Court on transmission by the Secretary
of State; 2.
in Scotland, to the Court of Session, or in the case of a maintenance judgment
to the Sheriff Court on transmission by the Secretary of State; 3.
in Northern Ireland, to the High Court of Justice, or in the case of a
maintenance judgment to the Magistrates' Court on transmission by the Secretary
of State. The
jurisdiction of local courts shall be determined by reference to the place
of domicile of the party against whom enforcement is sought. If he is not
domiciled in the State in which enforcement is sought, it shall be determined
by reference to the place of enforcement. Article
33 The
procedure for making the application shall be governed by the law of the
State in which enforcement is sought. The
applicant must give an address for service of process within the area of
jurisdiction of the court applied to. However, if the law of the State
in which enforcement is sought does not provide for the furnishing of such
an address, the applicant shall appoint a representative ad litem. The
documents referred to in Articles 46 and 47 shall be attached to the application. Article
34 The
court applied to shall give its decision without delay; the party against
whom enforcement is sought shall not at this stage of the proceedings be
end to make any submissions on the application. The
application may be refused only for one of the reasons specified in Articles
27 and 28. Under no circumstances may the foreign judgment be reviewed
as to its substance. Article
35 The
appropriate officer of the court shall without delay bring the decision
given on the application to the notice of the applicant in accordance with
the procedure laid down by the law of the State in which enforcement is
sought. If
enforcement is authorized, the party against whom enforcement is sought
may appeal against the decision within one month of service thereof. If
that party is domiciled in a Contracting State other than that in which
the decision authorizing enforcement was given, the time for appealing
shall be two months and shall run from the date of service, either on him
in person or at his residence. No extension of time may be granted on account
of distance. Article
37 -
in Belgium, with the tribunal de premiere instance or rechtbank van eersteaanleg. -
in Denmark, with the landsret, -
in the Federal Republic of Germany, with the Oberlandesgericht, -
in France, with the cour d'appel, -
in Ireland, with the High Court, -
in Italy, with the corte d'appello, -
in Luxembourg, with the Court superieure de justice sitting as a court
of civil appeal, -
in the Netherlands, with the arrondissementsrechtbank, -
in the United Kingdom: 1.
in England and Wales, with the High Court of Justice, or in the case of
a maintenance judgment with the Magistrates' Court; 2.
in Scotland, with the Court of Session, or in the case of a maintenance
judgment with the Sheriff Court; 3.
in Northern Ireland, with the High Court of Justice, or in the case of
a maintenance judgment with the Magistrates' Court. The
judgment given on the appeal may be contested only: -
in Belgium, France, Italy, Luxembourg and the Netherlands, by an appeal
in cassation, -
in Denmark, by an appeal to the højesteret, with the leave
of the Minister of Justice, -
in the Federal Republic of Germany, by a Rechtsbeschwerde, -
in Ireland, by an appeal on a point of law to the Supreme Court, -
in the United Kingdom, by a single further appeal on a point of law. Article
38 The
court with which the appeal under the first paragraph of Article 37 is
lodged may, on the application of the appellant, stay the proceedings if
an ordinary appeal has been lodged against the judgment in the State in
which that judgment was given or if the time for such an appeal has not
yet expired; in the latter case, the court may specify the time within
which such an appeal is to be lodged. Where
the judgment was given in Ireland or the United Kingdom, any form of appeal
available in the State in which it was given shall be treated as an ordinary
appeal for the purposes of the first paragraph. The
court may also make enforcement conditional on the provision of such security
as it shall determine. Article
39 During
the time specified for an appeal pursuant to Article 36 and until any such
appeal has been determined, no measures of enforcement may be taken other
than protective measures taken against the property of the party against
whom enforcement is sought. The
decision authorizing enforcement shall carry with it the power to proceed
to any such protective measures. Article
40 If
the application for enforcement is refused, the applicant may appeal: -
in Belgium, to the cour d'appel or hof van beroep, -
in Denmark, to the landsret, -
in the Federal Republic of Germany, to the Oberlandesgericht, -
in France, to the cour d'appel, -
in Ireland, to the High Court, -
in Italy, to the corte d'appello, -
in Luxembourg, to the Court superieure de justice sitting as a court of
civil appeal. -
in the Netherlands, to the arrondissementsrechtbank, -
in the United Kingdom: 1.
in England and Wales, to the High Court of Justice, or in the case of a
maintenance judgment to the Magistrates' Court; 2.
in Scotland, to the Court of Session, or in the case of a maintenance judgment
to the Sheriff Court; 3.
in Northern Ireland, to the High Court of Justice, or in the case of a
maintenance judgment to the Magistrates' Court. The
party against whom enforcement is sought shall be summoned to appear before
the appellate court. If he fails to appear, the provisions of the second
and third paragraphs of Article 20 shall apply even where he is not domiciled
in any of the Contracting States. A
judgment given on an appeal provided for in Article 40 may be contested
only: -
in Belgium, France, Italy, Luxembourg and the Netherlands, by an appeal
in cassation, -
in Denmark, by an appeal to the h0jesteret, with the leave of the Minister
of Justice. -
in the Federal Republic of Germany, by a Rechtsbeschwerde, -
in the United Kingdom, by a single further appeal on a point of law. Article
42 Where
a foreign judgment has been given in respect of several matters and enforcementcannot
be authorized for all of them, the court shall authorize enforcement for
one or more of them. An
applicant may request partial enforcement of a judgment. Article
43 A
foreign judgment which orders a periodic payment by way of a penalty shall
be enforceable in the State in which
enforcement is sought only if the amount of the payment has been finally
determined by the courts of the State in which the judgment was given. Article
44 An
applicant who, in the State in which the judgment was given, has benefited
from complete or partial legal aid or exemption from costs or expenses,
shall be entitled, in the procedures provided for in
Articles 32 to 35, to benefit from the most favourable legal aid or the
most extensive exemption from costs or expenses provided for by the law
of the State addressed. However, an applicant who requests the enforcement
of a decision given by an administrative authority in Denmark in resp